A newspaper invaded Meghan Markle‘s privacy by publishing a personal letter to her estranged father, a U.K. judge ruled Thursday, in a major victory for Markle in her campaign against what she sees as media intrusion.
The Duchess of Sussex, 39, sued publisher Associated Newspapers for invasion of privacy and copyright infringement over five February 2019 articles in the Mail on Sunday and on the MailOnline website that published large portions of a letter to her father, Thomas Markle.
High Court judge Mark Warby ruled that the publisher had misused her private information.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle: ‘No way that we can move forward unless we acknowledge the past’
Meghan Markle seeks ruling over ‘serious breach’ of her privacy
He said the duchess “had a reasonable expectation that the contents of the letter would remain private. The Mail articles interfered with that reasonable expectation.”
Associated Newspapers contested the claim, and a trial was scheduled for the fall. It would have been one of the most high-profile civil legal showdowns in London for years.
But at hearings last month, lawyers for Markle asked for a summary judgment to settle the case without a trial.
COVID-19: Calgary man says he was given no reason for quarantine in undisclosed hotel
Canadians’ wealth is tied to their parents’ more than ever, StatCan finds
The judge agreed, saying the disclosures of Markle’s private letter “were manifestly excessive and hence unlawful.”
#FreeBritney: Why fans are concerned (again) for Britney Spears
“There is no prospect that a different judgment would be reached after a trial,” he said.
Markle’s lawyers say the “deeply personal” five-page letter was intended for her father alone. Her lawyer Justin Rushbrooke argued in January that the publisher had “no real prospect” of winning the case.
But the defence argued Markle wrote the letter as part of a media strategy to rebut a negative view conveyed by her father, and with help from the communications team in the royal couple’s Kensington Palace office.
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle share sweet video of son Archie on 1st birthday
Thursday’s ruling means Markle has won her case on privacy grounds, but the judge said a “limited trial” should be held to decide who owns the copyright to the letter.
The defence argues that multiple people may be copyright-holders because more than one person contributed to the letter.
Disney fires Gina Carano from ‘Mandalorian’ over Holocaust remark
The judge said that argument “cannot be described as convincing, and seems improbable,” but should still be decided at a trial.
Markle, an American actor and star of TV legal drama Suits, married Prince Harry, a grandson of Queen Elizabeth II, at Windsor Castle in May 2018. Their son, Archie, was born the following year.
In early 2020, Markle and Harry announced they were quitting royal duties and moving to North America, citing what they said were the unbearable intrusions and racist attitudes of the British media.
They recently bought a house in Santa Barbara, Calif.
© 2021 The Canadian Press